Looking for a climate change essay that will be a useful example for you? You are in the right place. On myeasypaper.com, we have an absolutely free sample for college students. Make sure to check it before working on your own paper or contacting our experts by placing the order with us to get a unique plagiarism-free copy. 


Climate Change Essay Topics: Examples and Things to Consider

If you are not limited in the choice of topics for your college essay on climate change, we suggest skipping popular climate change research paper topics, preferring something not trivial instead. Try to change your focus or choose an unusual view of the problem. Instead of writing about common reasons for global warming, try to predict whether it is that dangerous for our generations, for example. You can check more topics below:

  • Human impact on ecology in the developing countries
  • The real villains of global warming: How big corporations make life on Earth impossible
  • Is it still possible to overcome climate change? 
  • Global warming: Is it a real problem?
  • Who is to blame for climate change?
  • Ecological or financial gain: Are paper bags and re-usable coffee cups helping?
  • Babies and ecological harm: How products for children pollute our planet


Climate Change Essay: The Best Free Sample

We have prepared a draft for the essay about environmental changes. As this is just a draft, it does not contain such auxiliary elements of an academic essay as references or formatting. At the same time, the essay has proper structure, grammar, and use of arguments, which makes it a perfect example to follow. 


Climate Changes: Are We the Ones to Blame?

Even though the current world is more preoccupied with geopolitical changes and challenges, environmental problems did not disappear. The world is still overpopulated and polluted, while the resources of energy are still limited. However, while many people try to reduce the negative impact of human activity, their attempts seem to be insufficient as globally there are little or no positive changes in the climate. Will anything change significantly if more people dedicate themselves to an ecological lifestyle? Or is this just a trend that helps marketing specialists to gain more profit from their products? This paper claims that the main culprit of environmental problems is big business and developing countries' parliaments rather than people from the democratic world who limit themselves to be less destroying the environment. 

While people in Europe and America buy electric transport that is designed to eliminate the negative impact of car emissions on the atmosphere, the majority of air pollution belongs to agricultural and energetic sectors. According to European Environment Agency, more than 80% of ammonia and methane emissions come from agriculture, while 60% of sulphur oxides are the result of energy production and distribution. Other factors, such as fuel combustion, natural phenomena, and business activity also contribute to different types of emissions. Public transport is responsible only for 40% of nitrogen oxide emissions and particulate matters. Therefore, even if people change their cars to electric ones, it will not make a significant impact even though will change the situation slightly. 

What is also interesting, the ecological lifestyle is more prevalent in developed countries with high income, while developing countries do not care about climate changes that much. The list of the greenest countries in the world consists of the developed countries only, such as Denmark, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. Developing countries, instead, are responsible for 63% of carbon emissions with China’s industry being the leader. People in India, for example, continue to pollute their rivers, causing water issues, while their authorities still did not provide a proper water supply system, which does not improve the climate situation. Those developing countries that have the smallest ecological footprint usually are the smallest ones and those that do not have significant production on their territories. 

Finally, ecological products are often promoted for the gain of corporations and not for the sake of environmental stability. When buying any eco-friendly product, one must define whether the ecological footprint of its production is not higher than the positive outcome of its use. Paper bags as an alternative to plastic bags can be a loud example here: it takes four times more energy to produce a paper bag compared to a plastic one. A person has to use a paper bag at least several times to make it more eco-friendly than a single-use plastic bag, which is difficult as paper bags often tear or get wet. At this point, plastic bags for life appear to be the most ecological alternative. Even when it comes to electric cars, their production (especially when it comes to batteries) has several shortcomings, including the negative impact on nearby households, emissions during production, and the impossibility of batteries re-use. While old lead-acid batteries could be recycled by 99%, only 5% of their modern analogs, lithium-ion batteries, are currently recycled in the United States. 

The arguments mentioned above are only several to consider when discussing human activity's impact on climate change. Even though each person’s action matters, there is a need to put the majority of responsibility on those whose impact is more negative and more significant, such as big corporations and state authorities. While companies continue using eco-unfriendly technologies, seeking financial gain rather than a balanced future for planet Earth, re-usable bags or coffee cups will not help in overcoming numerous pollution issues.